Bob Renzi believes that teachers represent the first and best line of defense against school violence.
While several school shootings, including the murders of several Amish school children in the central part of the state recently, make the news, Renzi believes teachers can learn to prevent some tragedies. He said reports of school violence have made people more aware of the potential for danger and more interested in preventing it.
“I really don’t think schools know what to do to prevent potentially fatal violent acts,” he said. “I always believed your teachers are your first line of protection in the schools. They are the majority of the employees in all schools, and training them is essential in life-threatening situations
“A combat course is also more fun and can also be helpful to protect one against everyday street attacks that occur,” Renzi said. “Don’t water it down by calling it self-defense. To protect yourself against life-threatening attacks and threats, you need military-style combatives. They are easy to learn, simple to execute, quickly retained and very effective.”
He would like to see hands-on defensive classes become part of in-service days. Such skills could protect large numbers of students.
“If you have a lot of teachers trained, in a terroristic attack, you have a better chance than with one or two security guards that may be in another part of the building,” Renzi said.
I agree that teachers have the most influence on and dangerous situation. Luckily, schools can use more than one method of defense. For example, a school can educate its teachers and hire security guards.
What do you think?
Saturday, April 14th 2007 at 9:56 am
Dale Yeager,
Thanks for your comments!
I can see the correlation between truancy and troubled kids from dysfunctional homes. However, I don’t see how stopping truancy will help. Truancy is a symptom of the problem. Treating the symptoms of a problem doesn’t solve the problem.
Personally, I think the schools would work more effectively if they just let kids who didn’t want to come to school not come. Then, kick out any kids who break the rules. That way the schools can focus the resources on the kids who actually want to learn what the school teaches.
In fact, if I had my way, there would be no public schools. People could voluntarily choose what private schools they want to attend (and they want their kids to attend). That way parents/students could find a school that meets their needs.
Thanks,
Scott
Friday, April 13th 2007 at 2:06 pm
Truancy: The root of all school safety problems!
“No child falls through the cracks. They are dropped through or shoved through by lazy, emotionally immature adults and unethical professionals”
After the Columbine shootings I made this statement during an interview on national television. The reporter asked if I really believed that statement and I replied, “absolutely!”
But you may ask what this statement has to do with the issue of truancy? Simple, truant children – who are routinely late or absent – come from dysfunctional homes. Those homes in my experience are lead by caregivers who are more concerned about there own pleasures and convenience than the welfare of their children. Some may say that this is an unkind assessment. My response to them is simple, visit these homes and you will see that this is not an aberration.
While some caregivers have a difficult time because of poverty, work schedules or transitioning to a single parent household; the majority simply refuse to exercise self control or basic order in their homes.
And this assessment is supported by various national studies. Research from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and the U.S. Department of Education have found that child neglect and family disorganization are major factors in truancy. The OJJDP also found that “Truancy has been clearly identified as one of the early warning signs of students headed for potential delinquent activity, social isolation, or educational failure via suspension, expulsion, or dropping out.”
More disturbing is a document that I have used for many years in criminal profiling, the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP-II). In this well respected assessment tool, caregiver issues and truancy become connected as impetuses for teen sex offender development:
Inconstant and instable caregivers before the age of 10. Multiple changes in caregivers and living situations.
Chronic truancy, fighting with peers or teachers.
Dr Gerald Patterson sums up the issue this way, “Parenting plays a critical role in the development process of children. Early discipline failures are a primary casual factor in the development of conduct problems. Harsh discipline, low supervision, lack of parental involvement all add to the development of aggressive children”
Bullying, sexual harassment, negative behavior cliques and aggression towards staff are all done by children who come from dysfunctional homes. But beyond the home environment, schools have a big stake in controlling truancy. Not only is it a major part of NCLB compliance but it affects all school safety issues. The US DOE has tracked the following school issues that directly contribute to truancy.
• Lack of effective and consistently applied attendance policies.
• Poor record-keeping, making truancy difficult to spot.
• Teacher characteristics, such as lack of respect for students and neglect of diverse student needs.
• Unsafe environment, for example a school with ineffective discipline policies where bullying is tolerated. [5 percent of students in grades 9 through 12 skipped school because they felt unsafe at school or on their way to or from school.]
Truancy happens in rural, suburban and urban schools and all classes of families. School must take control of their truancy problems or they are bound to be overtaken by it.
A well managed school is a safe school!