Self-Defense & Violence Prevention Blog

news and commentary about security, self-defense, and topics like violent crime prevention and bullying

Athletes And Guns: A Loaded Question

  • Home
  • Guns
  • Athletes And Guns: A Loaded Question

Tampa Bay running back Errict Rhett was making a career of fearlessly confronting 300-pound linemen and rock-solid linebackers, but his first encounter with real, heart-thumping fright came the day he faced a .45-caliber muzzle.

That was a decade ago[…]

“My heart started beating so fast it was uncontrollable,” he said. “I’ve never been so scared. The whole world got quiet.”

That moment changed him. Rhett, like a lot of other professional athletes, decided he would never again leave home without his own concealed handgun.

While NBA and NFL officials decline to estimate how many players are licensed to carry weapons, a spate of recent gun incidents involving professional and college players has revealed that numerous athletes apparently are armed.

NBA Commissioner David Stern tackled the subject during his annual preseason conference call in October, saying he prefers that players keep their guns at home.

“We think this is an alarming subject,” Stern said. “Although you’ll read players saying how they feel safer with guns, in fact those guns actually make them less safe.”

The commissioner argued that carrying a gun dramatically increases “your chances of being shot by one.”

Todd Boyd, a critical studies professor at USC specializing in pop culture, calls guns part of the real world of many young athletes.

“So many of these players come from impoverished, urban or rural South environments,” Boyd said. “Now you talk about that kid becoming an NBA player, making a lot of money, wearing expensive jewelry, driving expensive cars, and coming from a culture where you have to protect yourself — it’s no surprise they’re taking steps to cover each other.

“Of course, the guys who are smart have guys around them with guns — bodyguards.”

After his encounter with the .45-caliber handgun at a Tampa carwash and barbershop, when Rhett was able to talk his way out of trouble, he went on to play another five seasons in the NFL — after the Buccaneers, he went to the Ravens and the Cleveland Browns.

And he remained an armed athlete.

“It’s a simple reason,” he said. “You want to protect yourself with a gun, not flaunt it.”

Read entire article by Lance Pugmire.

These young and glamorous athletes epitomize the same universal rules that apply to everyone else. Anyone can need or want guns, or other weapons, for self-defense. Guns and other weapons are tools. Used intelligently by someone who only wants to defend himself or others, guns help out a lot. However, used foolishly and/or maliciously, guns can put both the bearer and the rest of us in danger.

So long as someone does not offensively harm or try to offensively harm anyone else, then let them keep their self-defense tools, whether guns or something else. However, if someone commits a victimizing crime, such as assault, with a gun or not, then I say let us disallow that person from possessing guns and other tools that may drive the person to commit an act of victimization, or help the person commit an act of victimization.

I personally think that more often than not it is unwise to carry a gun, namely concerning untrained carriers. More often than not, I find guns less effective than other less-dangerous self-defense tools, such as pepper spray, tasers, or martial arts. Nonetheless, it is the judgment of the individual to decide which tools he or she wishes to use in their life. Accordingly, it is the decision of an innocent and mentally-competent person to decide if he/she wants to carry or not carry a gun.

What do you think?

By | December 18th, 2006 | SHOW COMMENTS (3)


I am the creator of this website, which I use to post about self-defense and violence prevention. I have two children who I love so much. I want them to be proud of me, and I hope what I do here contributes to that. Please let me know what you think about my posts by leaving a comment below. I throw my opinions around pretty openly here, but I am totally open to opposing viewpoints and a productive discussion. So please post a comment. And follow me on Twitter: @scottmhughes

3 Responses

  1. Idetrorce says

    very interesting, but I don’t agree with you

  2. Andrew says

    Yeah I only have to think about how they got that statistic for a little while to see that it’s absolute BS.

    A great majority of people who carry guns I imagine are involved in gangs or live in a place where it’s very common to get shot. And anyone who commits a crime with a gun is likely to get shot by a cop. What about the people who don’t carry guns? They probably live in relatively safe areas, with safe lifestyles. And I’m sure there are a lot more good neighborhoods than bad neighborhoods. Of course, statistically, people who have guns are already under more risk than people who don’t.

  3. Matt C. says

    “We think this is an alarming subject,” Stern said. “Although you’ll read players saying how they feel safer with guns, in fact those guns actually make them less safe.”

    The commissioner argued that carrying a gun dramatically increases “your chances of being shot by one.”

    That is such BS. There are three kinds of people in this world, victims, future victims, and gun owners. Athletes are celebreties and have to deal with all sorts of nutjobs, and in addition they have the same 2nd amendment rights as everyone else.


(no http, so not